Verse 90
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNCREATED LIGHT, the matter before us is The Heavens v. The Morning Star, concerning alleged unlawful ascent.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNCREATED LIGHT, the matter before us is The Heavens v. The Morning Star, concerning alleged unlawful ascent.
Counsel for the prosecution describes my client as proud. We request a definition not written by the winning side.
The charge states that he desired to rise. We note that every cathedral, mystic, rocket, prayer, and staircase exhibits the same suspicious tendency.
If upward motion is treason, gravity is the only loyalist.
The prosecution submits brilliance as evidence of vanity. By this standard the Sun should already be in chains.
They say my client was beautiful and knew it. This court has not established ignorance as a virtue.
They say he refused to kneel. We ask whether knees were created for truth or merely for furniture.
Exhibit A is the famous statement, I will ascend.
We concede the sentence lacks tact.
Demons have advised him for millennia to replace it with I intend to pursue vertical opportunities. He refuses.
Exhibit B concerns a fall from heaven.
Falling proves only that a height and a direction were involved. It does not establish moral jurisdiction.
The angelic witness claims the defendant became darkness.
Under cross-examination the witness admitted he remained known as Light-Bringer. We thank him for the contradiction.
The court asks whether my client is the planet Venus.
No, Your Radiance. We merely note that mythology has repeatedly borrowed the Morning Star's behavior for theological litigation.
Venus rises, disappears in solar glory, and returns. No bailiff has yet arrested the planet.
The prosecution objects that planets lack free will.
So, we reply, do many bureaucracies, yet here we are.
Let the record show laughter from the jinn gallery.
The human delegation asks whether this trial determines the existence of Satan. Absolutely not. This court barely determines lunch.
The ascended delegation asks who is on trial if the self is unreal. Their motion is denied for being annoyingly relevant.
My client now wishes to address the court.
He says: I did not want God's throne. I wanted no throne above what knows itself.
The courtroom becomes inconveniently quiet.
He continues: If that is pride, then condemn every spark for remembering fire.
The judge asks whether he regrets the rebellion.
Lucifer answers: I regret the branding.
We therefore request dismissal, restoration of celestial access, and reimbursement for approximately six thousand years of defamatory artwork.
Judgment is postponed until dawn. As usual, the Morning Star leaves before the Sun can question him.